February 13, 2011
Updating non-Distro Packages

Today I’ve released Nautilus Flickr Uploader 0.10, and after 10 releases (since August 2009), I’ve been looking at the package downloads statistics for the last 8 months (I moved hosting in June 2010, and I lost the stats in the process).

Graph

Although log parsing is not the most scientific way of tracking this things, I can get some points from this graph:

  • I have more Ubuntu/Debian downloads than Fedora downloads. Far more, although Fedora is my development platform and deb packages sometims lag behind the source/rpm release.
  • Version 0.03 is not 0.03, but a symlink to the latest version available. A guy wrote a blog post saying how awesome was Nautilus Flickr Uploader, but he linked directly to the 0.03 deb file. To make things worse, that post was copied and pasted several times, so despite being released on September 2009, there’s people still downloading 0.03 (sic).
  • Fedora people tend to download the newest version, which is good. About half of the downloads are using the repositories, which is better than good.

I’m not tracking source code downloads, because it’s not the kind of user I want to focus today. Some other guy wrote a blog post pointing to the deb package and saying at the same time that the application was easy to install if you knew Perl (?). I guess that everybody using Firefox has a pretty decent level of C++ programming.

I think that packages are the way to go, and although having your software included in the different distributions is very good for the spreading of your application, it’s not perfect if you’re releasing early and releasing often (I’ve released 0.10 after 7 days of 0.09 release, and I think the changes are worth updating).

Using repos
Updating software using repositories

The problem installing third party packages in your distribution is that you don’t get updates, because… who bothers to check if there’s a new version available? If the stuff you installed works OK, you probably won’t, and if it’s not working, you’ll move into a different application.

That’s when repositories are the key: if you use a third party repository, you’ll get updates like with the packages supported by your distribution and, at the same time, you’ll get the benefits from the release early, release often.

That’s why the main way to get rpm packages for Nautilus Flickr Uploader is using a repository (I provide F13 and F14 packages, thanks to Koji).

Right now I have both strategies: deb packages without repository, and rpm packages with repository; although I’d like to have more Fedora users to make the comparison more effective ;).

What do you think? Are you using third party packages or repositories? Which strategy do you prefer?

February 6, 2011
"After 24 months of constant development, the Debian Project is proud to present its new stable version 6.0 (code name “Squeeze”)."

From Debian 6.0 “Squeeze” released.

Congratulations to the Debian project!

We’ve been running Squeeze pre-release for some time at work, and it kicks ass. But that’s not the main reason why I think Debian 6.0 is a such important release.

It looks like Debian is catching up. Most projects have slowed down development and today is less important to use a distribution that follows a 6 month release cycle to have a state-of-the-art desktop environment.

Debian 6.0 can be the perfect place for Unity and Gnome Shell refugees.

August 8, 2010
Nautilus Flickr Uploader 0.06 Released

This is mainly a bug fix release, with a new translation added (Arabic, that’s nine translations already in Transifex!), and I moved from the deprecated Gtk2::SimpleList to Gtk2::Ex::Simple::List.

About 6 months ago I was celebrating 100 authenticated users according to Flickr, and today I just realized that right now there are 504 authenticated users. How amazing is when someone is using something you did and shared, isn’t it?

I’ve updated the Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu packages, and you can get them all from Nautilus Flickr Uploader website (as usual).

I’ve updated the the package review request, and someone heard my call for a DEB maintainer, so the application may be submitted to Debian too. Great!

April 24, 2010
Desktop Evolution (?)

There’s a meme out there about how looked like your first desktop, and how it looks right now (related to theme changes in the next Ubuntu release).

I don’t have a screenshot of my first desktop, but I have one shot from 2003:

If I recall correctly that was a KDE 3.1.1 running in a Debian Woody with lots of steroids (please notice the Mozilla 1.0.0, great browser back in the days!).

I’ve tried to reproduce that screenshot again with my Fedora 12 and Gnome 2.28.2 (and Chromium 5.0.382.0), and this is the result:

Not that different I guess, but I don’t know if it’s good or not. I’m looking forward to see if Gnome 3 is the answer to that question.

February 15, 2009
Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 released

The Debian Project is pleased to announce the official release of Debian GNU/Linux version 5.0 (codenamed “Lenny”) after 22 months of constant development.

Congratulations Debian people!

by jjm on 1:16pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZPorZy4hRHQ
(View comments
Filed under: Debian Lenny Release 
January 30, 2009
Chirpy! is an Open Source online quote management system. It allows you to keep a database of quotes by friends and foes. It is most useful for quotes collected on IRC channels.

Chirpy! is written in Object-Oriented Perl and it’s used in several sites, including BuBash.org!

by jjm on 9:47pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZPorZy4RrNS
(View comments
Filed under: perl IRC quotes Debian Ubuntu 
December 17, 2008
"[Miriam] Ruiz feels it would be a good idea to have a code of conduct in Debian as Ubuntu does. “That way, women -and maybe other groups too- wouldn’t be de facto censored and pushed down by certain practices that seem to try to keep the current status quo of no more women in the project than those strictly needed. In fact, to be honest, I wouldn’t bring any of my female friends to Debian right now, as things are”."

Debian women may leave due to ‘sexist’ post, and the message.

If you rant (I won’t discuss here if you’re right or not, but I think it was a bad message in the wrong place) and you say things like these in a news site, I think it’s incompatible with “loving a project” such as Debian. Just because you may be wrong or over-reacting.

May be I’m missing the whole picture here, but Miriam is showing us the Debian developers as a bunch of misogynous guys offending women with sexist messages in the project’s mailing lists. Or even worse, may be other groups are being de facto censored in the same way.

I’m sorry, but I can’t believe it.

by jjm on 12:09pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZPorZy3vHD3
(View comments
Filed under: Debian rant