June 15, 2011
"Way back in 1999 I predicted a significant market for desktop Linux by 2005. (I was targeting better than Mac OS type numbers, in the 10-15% range.) It was clear back then that Linux had found a substantial adoption as a server OS, and it seemed only time before the desktop adoption rivaled at least “the other desktop”. Obviously I was wrong."

From Focusing on the next Linux client (btw the title of the post is a picture).

TL;DR: we give the tiniest sh*t for the Linux desktop, and it’s because we think it’s irrelevant.

This post wasn’t needed Adobe, we already knew that. Sincerely yours, a Flash 64bits Linux user.

by jjm on 5:52pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZPorZy66sJOC
(View comments  
August 2, 2010
Why isn’t $LANG Popular in Industry?

With LANG=haskell, Why isn’t Haskell popular in Industry?

It’s interesting because I think that list of 9 points can apply to other languages too (such as Perl).

A language is unpopular because it’s different, and it makes it difficult to learn. Moreover a language can be popularly known to be difficult, or believed to have known problems, such as maintainability or code readability.

It’s very difficult to hire programmers that already know it, because it’s unpopular. Although you can teach it, it doesn’t make the language suitable for your projects, because you need good programmers already trained, and you can’t find them!

All together makes that language a risky option that gets discarded in favour of other ‘industry leading’ languages such as Java.

And don’t forget the customer: they’re used to some words, and although it’s not their business, they tend to be more happy if they know (or think they know) about the technology you’re using. So, it can be harder to sell an application made in Haskell.

At the end, sadly, the advantages of using $LANG aren’t that important.